We are deploying 2 applications which has a Class with the same canonical name (e.g. com.example.BusinessObject), we stored instances of this class to Business Repo, now every time I load the instances of BusinessObject, I see all instances from two different applications.

Is there any way to limit Business Repo only load instances from the current applications? Is it a bug in Ivy Engine related to this?

asked 22.01.2019 at 03:58

vinh_'s gravatar image

accept rate: 40%

can you share the idea why you have duplicated that class? are you trying to implement a multi-tenancy approach with multiple apps? In my opinion a business data class should be very specific and bound to context of the actual project. So it seems strange to me to use the same class in separate projects...

(22.01.2019 at 04:17) Reguel Werme... ♦♦ Reguel%20Wermelinger's gravatar image

I share the ideas of reguel. But at the end this is a bug. we use the same index for the same java class all over the engine. we should split this index further by application. i already did some research some times ago. but nothing is planned at the moment to fix this.

(22.01.2019 at 05:06) Alex Suter ♦♦ Alex%20Suter's gravatar image

We have a core module which has the BusinessObject, then we have many other module provide functionality and reuse the BusinessObject from core module.

We have two branch of applications which have different set of functionality but depend on the same core module.

We deploy that two set of modules on two separate applications on the same Ivy Engine and face the issue.

(22.01.2019 at 05:09) vinh_ vinh_'s gravatar image

We face the same problem with a customer who deploys the same application twice on the same engine and the data are not kept separated per application.

Is there any progress for this topic or do you have a tip to find a quick working solution?

(30.07.2019 at 06:47) Fotini Kalan... Fotini%20Kalantidou's gravatar image

Hello Fotini As I have learned, this is not a bug but a conscious design decision. But the spirits are divided whether this is good or not. For you at the moment, the only solution is to model the name of the app itself in the business data and to consider the name of the app in queries. There is story to tackle this XIVY-3063, but not planned. Push this story at your stakeholder responsible.

(07.08.2019 at 03:47) Alex Suter ♦♦ Alex%20Suter's gravatar image
Be the first one to answer this question!
toggle preview

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here



Answers and Comments

Markdown Basics

  • *italic* or _italic_
  • **bold** or __bold__
  • link:[text](http://url.com/ "Title")
  • image?![alt text](/path/img.jpg "Title")
  • numbered list: 1. Foo 2. Bar
  • to add a line break simply add two spaces to where you would like the new line to be.
  • basic HTML tags are also supported



Asked: 22.01.2019 at 03:58

Seen: 1,242 times

Last updated: 07.08.2019 at 03:47